w3.org - public-ws-addressing-comments

This forum is an archive for the mailing list public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org (more options) Messages posted here will be sent to this mailing list.
List Purpose: Mailing list for gathering comments on the Web Services Addressing specification developed by the Web Services Addressing Working Group.
12
Topics (59)
Replies Last Post Views
[comment] WS-Addressing Conformance section by Karl Dubost
0
by Karl Dubost
LC ISSUE: Consistency of examples by David Hull
0
by David Hull
WSDL Binding Doc - Editorial Comments by David Illsley-2
0
by David Illsley-2
WSDL Binding editorial comments by David Hull
0
by David Hull
Re: why are the WS-Addressing WSDL binding elements capitalized? by Bob Freund-Hitachi
0
by Bob Freund-Hitachi
Re: ID-typed attribute on WS-Addressing EPRs? by Jonathan Marsh
0
by Jonathan Marsh
[WS-A] [source endpoint] use by Philippe Jausions
0
by Philippe Jausions
why are the WS-Addressing WSDL binding elements capitalized? by Craig Salter
0
by Craig Salter
New CR issue: use of predfined fault actions for application faults [was FW: Action in 1133, 1134] by Jonathan Marsh
0
by Jonathan Marsh
FW: New Issue: Strengthen guidance on protocol-specifc fault action values by Jonathan Marsh
0
by Jonathan Marsh
New issue: Use SOAP 1.2 properties where possible in describing SOAP 1.2 behavior. by David Hull
0
by David Hull
WSA cr10 issue resolution: TAG Request for Change to WS Addressing Core by Hugo Haas
2
by noah_mendelsohn
Fw: New issue: Default value of To property by Francisco Curbera
0
by Francisco Curbera
Re: New CR Issue: Relation of SOAP Headers to transport-level headers by David Hull
0
by David Hull
[Fwd: CR Issue "The basic interaction pattern from which all others are composed is "one-way"."] by David Hull
0
by David Hull
precise meaning of an anonymous destination in a request message by paul.downey
0
by paul.downey
Addressing 1.0: Core and SOAP issues by Philippe Le Hegaret
0
by Philippe Le Hegaret
New CR Issue: OPTIONAL or REQUIRED? by Yalcinalp, Umit
3
by David Hull
New CR Issue: Core Specification is inconsistent with wg resolutions (Issue 20 subissue d) by Yalcinalp, Umit
0
by Yalcinalp, Umit
New CR Issue: Exact relationship of anonymous URI to SOAP request-response by David Hull
0
by David Hull
New CR Issue: Relation of SOAP Headers to transport-level headers by David Hull
0
by David Hull
New Issue: SOAP Binding CR document needs to specify two additional predefined faults in Section 5.4.1 by Yalcinalp, Umit
0
by Yalcinalp, Umit
NEW CR Issue (core): Is [reference parameters] ordered or unordered? by David Hull
0
by David Hull
Potential Removal of wsa:From by Kliewer, Greg
0
by Kliewer, Greg
12