Ted Hardie-2
Ted Hardie-2
Unregistered User
Groups: Anyone
Posts in w3.org
1234
Show   Total: 77 items
Date Subject Count Location
BoF proposal 0 replies w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt 10 replies w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-proxy-explanation-00.txt 12 replies w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: Alissa Cooper's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-04: (with COMMENT) 1 reply w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: SSL/TLS everywhere fail 0 replies w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: SSL/TLS everywhere fail 11 replies w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: SSL/TLS everywhere fail 13 replies w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Process experiements (was Adjustments to our work mode - please read) 0 replies w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: Adjustments to our work mode - please read 1 reply w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-02, example on 3. 451 Unavailable For Legal Reasons 2 replies w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status 0 replies w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: #80: 451 / distinguishing intermediaries from origins 2 replies w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: 2 questions 0 replies w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: [url] Requests for Feedback (was Feedback from TPAC) 5 replies w3.org - public-ietf-w3c
Re: consensus on :query ? 10 replies w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: Mark's coalescing proposal 1 reply w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? 1 reply w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: Explicit proxy options and defaults 4 replies w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: What will incentivize deployment of explicit proxies? 3 replies w3.org - ietf-http-wg
Re: Trusting proxies (was Re: I revised the pro/contra document) 1 reply w3.org - ietf-http-wg
1234