James Fuller-2
James Fuller-2
Unregistered User
Groups: Anyone
Posts in w3.org
12
Show   Total: 21 items
Date Subject Count Location
Re: a standard error port 1 reply w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
a standard error port 3 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
soliciting detailed non-xml use cases 2 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
Re: ease of use proposal - adding 'from' attribute to step to define connection 0 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
Re: ease of use proposal - adding 'from' attribute to step to define connection 3 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
Re: ease of use proposal - adding 'from' attribute to step to define connection 5 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
Re: ease of use proposal - adding 'from' attribute to step to define connection 11 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
ease of use - allow p:variable scoped to step 1 reply w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
ease of use proposal - adding 'from' attribute to step to define connection 13 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
Re: an idea: ports == options 1 reply w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
[xproc/specification] 09a37a: added build badge to README 0 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
[xproc/specification] 810c53: update travis keys for jfuller, xquery.github.io 0 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
Re: an idea: ports == options 2 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
Re: an idea: ports == options 3 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
issue #38 implicit p:inline 0 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
Re: New draft XProc 2.0 spec 0 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
Re: Low hanging fruit 0 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
implicit p:inline 0 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
comments on SCXML 0 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
Re: WG working on xproc requirements/use cases v2 0 replies w3.org - public-xml-processing-model-comments
12