[specref] Updates to tr.rdf

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[specref] Updates to tr.rdf

Kostiainen, Anssi
Hi Tobie,

Specref pulls in the following data for the Vibration API:

"edDraft": "http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/"

This should be:

"edDraft": "https://w3c.github.io/vibration/"

(We're doing some Rec errata and as part of the process moved migrated the spec to GH.)

Looking at scripts/rdf.js is seems the source for this data is tr.rdf:

var RDF_FILE = "http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr.rdf";

Any idea how to get the data in tr.rdf updated? The obvious solution of publishing the spec does not work AFAICT since the spec has hit Rec and publishing an errata alone won't trigger a tr.rdf update.

Thanks,

-Anssi
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [specref] Updates to tr.rdf

Tobie Langel-4
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, at 12:50, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote:

> Hi Tobie,
>
> Specref pulls in the following data for the Vibration API:
>
> "edDraft": "http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/"
>
> This should be:
>
> "edDraft": "https://w3c.github.io/vibration/"
>
> (We're doing some Rec errata and as part of the process moved migrated
> the spec to GH.)
>
> Looking at scripts/rdf.js is seems the source for this data is tr.rdf:
>
> var RDF_FILE = "http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr.rdf";
>
> Any idea how to get the data in tr.rdf updated? The obvious solution of
> publishing the spec does not work AFAICT since the spec has hit Rec and
> publishing an errata alone won't trigger a tr.rdf update.

Right, W3C doesn't want to modify tr.rdf for RECs.

I've added a dictionary[1] to the import script to deal with the exact
same problem for WebIDL.

You're welcome to add the vibration API there too.

--tobie

---
[1]: https://github.com/tobie/specref/blob/master/scripts/rdf.js#L42-L44

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [specref] Updates to tr.rdf

Kostiainen, Anssi

> On 26 Apr 2016, at 13:57, Tobie Langel <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, at 12:50, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote:

[...]

>> Any idea how to get the data in tr.rdf updated? The obvious solution of
>> publishing the spec does not work AFAICT since the spec has hit Rec and
>> publishing an errata alone won't trigger a tr.rdf update.
>
> Right, W3C doesn't want to modify tr.rdf for RECs.
>
> I've added a dictionary[1] to the import script to deal with the exact
> same problem for WebIDL.

Thanks! Exactly what I was looking for.

> You're welcome to add the vibration API there too.

Here you go:

https://github.com/tobie/specref/pull/275

Thanks,

-Anssi

> [1]: https://github.com/tobie/specref/blob/master/scripts/rdf.js#L42-L44