Thank you for this comment. The
Working Group this issue as a CR083 .
As a result of this comment, the Working
Group clarified this sentence, preferring the term “components” to
“definitions”, which is now implemented in the editor’s draft
Unless you let us know otherwise by
mid-January, we will assume you agree with the resolution of this issue.
Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
[hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Ramkumar Menon
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Editorial >> WSDL
2.0 definitions v/s WSDL 2.0 descriptions
I suggest a minor editorial change to the Part 1 [Core Language]
regarding the usage of the terms "WSDL 2.0 definitions" and
"WSDL 2.0 descriptions".
Quoting snippet from Section 2.1.2 [WSDL 2.0 definitions are
represented in XML by one or more WSDL 2.0 Information Sets (Infosets), that is
one or more description element
Quoting snippet from Section 4.2.1 [ Its actual value
indicates that the containing WSDL 2.0 document MAY contain qualified
references to WSDL 2.0 definitions in that namespace ]
These could be changed to WSDL 2.0 "descriptions" from
"definitions" - ensures consistent terminology.
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!
A typical Macroprocessor