[minutes] BPWG call on 2010-11-30

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[minutes] BPWG call on 2010-11-30

Francois Daoust
Hi,

The minutes of Tuesday's meeting are available at:
  http://www.w3.org/2010/11/30-bpwg-minutes.html

... and published as raw text below.

Resolution on EXI comment got taken: We accept François's kind suggestion regarding the EXI comment (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2010Nov/0002.html) and note that we feel this is a non-substantive, editorial change.

Adam and I will enact this change. I'll send an official reply to the comment afterwards.

Thanks,
Francois.


-----
30 Nov 2010

    See also: [2]IRC log

       [2] http://www.w3.org/2010/11/30-bpwg-irc

Attendees

    Present
           DKA, Matt, adam, SeanP, jo, fd_from_irc

    Regrets
    Chair
           DKA

    Scribe
           Matt

Contents

      * [3]Topics
          1. [4]EXI Comment
          2. [5]Any other business?
      * [6]Summary of Action Items
      _________________________________________________________

EXI Comment

    PROPOSED RESOLUTION: We accept François's kind suggestion regarding
    the EXI comment
    ([7]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2010Nov/0002.htm
    l) and note that we feel this is a non-substantive, editorial
    change.

       [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2010Nov/0002.html)

    <adam> +1

    <francois> +1

    jo: Whilst, one the one hand...
    ... I've got nothing to say about this. Lots of editorial plus ones.
    Eduardo is here, he might have something to say.

    RESOLUTION: We accept François's kind suggestion regarding the EXI
    comment
    ([8]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2010Nov/0002.htm
    l) and note that we feel this is a non-substantive, editorial
    change.

       [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2010Nov/0002.html)

    <jo> Edc did you have any comment on the RESOLUTION

    <EdC> I agree with the resolution. Sorry for late arrival.

Any other business?

    jo: Thank you Dan for chairing, and Matt without whom none of this
    would have been possible.

    [[paraphrased]

    DKA: Rotan reached out to me earlier in the week, wondering what
    more could be done to rally the troops behind the release of MWABP?

    We're in a period right now where it would be good to get AC member
    reps voting on the questionnaire.

    <francois> [/me notes questionnaire is closed now]

    DKA: The questionnaire was to move from PR to Rec, right?

    -> [9]http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/mwabp-2010/ Poll

       [9] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/mwabp-2010/

    DKA: My thing is that only Rotan and I have said we'd participate in
    publicizing the doc.
    ... I'm putting my hat in the ring to promote it. I'll be speaking
    at events in the coming weeks, where I'll be promoting MWABP. I'll
    be putting together some slides to do that. Would be good to have
    others involved in press activity, or to push W3C to do more press
    around it.

    adam: I got some feedback in passing, that they had seen it's gone
    to PR.

    DKA: We need to make the benefits of the document more evident to
    those outside of the working group.
    ... Any other thoughts, let's take them to the public list.

    <EdC> So there are no institutionalized measures to publicize W3C
    output when it is officially published?

    DKA: Thank you everyone! We're done.

    <francois> [I note W3C will do a press release when the spec is
    published as REC, but it would have more impact with members
    testimonials]

    DKA: W3C will issue a press release, but how many organizations will
    put testimonials on the release is the question.
    ... Thanks everybody!

Summary of Action Items

    [End of minutes]