The minutes of today's meeting are available at:
... and copied as raw text below.
Resolved during this call:
- 2-month charter extension requested to assist MWABP to Rec.
- Publication of latest draft of Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies as a WG Note requested.
- No further calls during MWABP PR review period. Calls will be scheduled as needed based on the reviews received.
- A few special thanks to people involved in the life of the WG:
* Dan and Jo for Great steering and stewardship
* Dom and myself as staff contacts
* Tom and Eduardo for their consistent contributions to the WG as invited experts.
Not sure what Shakespeare would say, but as Europe would say, "it's the final countdown".
19 Oct 2010
See also: IRC log
jeffs (+ observer), adam, jo, francois, EdC, Kai_Dietrich,
2. Charter extension
3. Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies
5. Informal gathering
* Summary of Action Items
<jeffs> one of our graduate students (Yerbol Yembergenov) is getting
ready to start up with the SVG WG, and if no one minds he will be
observing today's BPWG WG meeting
jo: Jeff has an observer. Any objection to that?
jo: Good news is that transition of MWABP to Proposed Recommendation
has been approved.
... Congratulations to the group and the editor, Adam!
francois: The Proposed Recommendation phase is targeted towards W3C
Membership. During the PR review period (4 weeks minimum), AC reps
from members companies are requested to fill out a questionnaire to
show support or to request changes in the document. At the end of
the review period, the group may have to respond to the comments
that may have been received. Nothing to be done during the review
period except remind your AC reps to fill out the questionnaire and
support the specification as-is.
jo: in short, Adam, you may not entirely be done, beware!
... One thing is sure, the PR review period will go after our
charter end date (end of this month).
... What I propose is that we request extension to the end of the
francois: No need to meet, no need to have calls indeed during the
PR review period.
<jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: The BPWG requests extension of its charter
<jo> 2010-12-31 solely in order to allow Mobile Web Application Best
<jo> to complete its transition to Rec. The WG does not intend to
meet other than to review any pR comments and resolve them.
francois: We'll precise that charter extension is solely to assist
MWABP to rec
RESOLUTION: The BPWG requests extension of its charter to 2010-12-31
solely in order to allow Mobile Web Application Best Practices to
complete its transition to Rec. The WG does not intend to meet other
than to review any PR comments and resolve them.
jo: Great! (Copyright ©2010, DKA)
Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies
jo: We are to publish the guidelines as a WG Note.
<jeffs> +1 for CT Guidelines for publication as a WG Note
jo: francois and I have prepared the updated draft. Only nits in the
Status of this document section.
-> Latest draft of CT guidelines
Most important changes:
[[ The Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group eventually resolved
to discontinue the work on this document and to publish it as a
Working Group Note. The Working Group hopes that this Note may serve
as a basis for discussion and negotiation among players.
Other than changes to this section, the document has not changed
since its publication as a W3C Candidate Recommendation. In
particular, the use of normative language has been kept as-is. ]]
<jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: The BPWG requests publication of the CT
Guidelines dated 18 October 2010 as a WG Note
<Kai> +1 works for me as written
jo: If everyone agrees here, I suggest we simply resolve to publish
that draft as a WG Note.
RESOLUTION: The BPWG requests publication of the CT Guidelines dated
18 October 2010 as a WG Note
jo: So CT Guidelines done.
... Anything else on that topic?
jo: As mentioned on the agenda, we are basically done.
... waiting for comments on the MWABP PR
... I suggest that we don't meet in the meantime.
<Kai> Informal gathering?
<jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: The WG will not meet again unless there
are comments arising from the PR period on MWABP
RESOLUTION: The WG will not meet again unless there are comments
arising from the PR period on MWABP
jo: My heart is filled with sorrow for having to put an end to this,
as well as joy!
<trackbot> ACTION-1035 -- Daniel Appelquist to create a plan to
raise awareness on mobileOK through some campaign -- due 2009-12-18
<trackbot> ACTION-1073 -- Jo Rabin to talk with Francois about what
is needed to enact the above resolution on CT Guidelines -- due
2010-10-05 -- OPEN
jo: Looking at remaining actions. Dan requested that we left
action-1035 open, probably as a memorial of some kind.
... next action is done.
<trackbot> ACTION-1073 Talk with Francois about what is needed to
enact the above resolution on CT Guidelines closed
Jo: Jumping to actions that are pending reviews
<trackbot> ACTION-1072 -- François Daoust to prepare distribution of
comments for BP2. -- due 2010-10-05 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> ACTION-1072 Prepare distribution of comments for BP2.
<trackbot> ACTION-1074 -- François Daoust to send transition request
to PR for MWABP -- due 2010-10-05 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> ACTION-1074 Send transition request to PR for MWABP
jo: And that, my dears, should be it.
... No open issues.
... Looking back at actions.
<trackbot> ACTION-1 -- Dean Jackson to test action - ignore -- due
2005-07-17 -- CLOSED
jo: First action was on 17 July 2005, and we went all the way to
action 1074. Great!
... Are there any business of any sort you'd like to discuss?
jo: Kai, you're the party guy, what do you suggest? :)
kai: nothing in particular, did you have anything in mind?
jo: not really, it's not in our power to request another meeting,
... let's leave that as an open thought
... I'd like to add some personal thanks on record.
<jeffs> +1 to applause for W3C team members Dom and Francois
jo: First of all, I'd like to thank Dom and Francois for their
fantastic support from W3C side.
<Kai> +1, well done and thank you so much!
<jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: WG would like to thank FD and preceding
Team Reps, especially Dom for their unparalleled support
RESOLUTION: WG would like to thank FD and preceding Team Reps,
especially Dom for their unparalleled support
jo: Secondly, I'd like to thank Eduardo and Tom Hume to have
contributed as Invited Experts. Eduardo, I'd really like to thank
you for the quality of your consistent technical comments
<jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: WG expresses its sincere thanks to EdC and
Tom for their contributions to the WG
RESOLUTION: WG expresses its sincere thanks to EdC and Tom for their
contributions to the WG as Invited Experts
jo: With that, I'd like to thank my colleague Dan Appelquist, and I
think we're done!
Kai: well, not quite. We'd like to thank you as well!
<jeffs> many thanks to Jo and Dan for their great work keeping the
meetings productive and on-track without losing their great senses
<jo> EdC yes!
PROPOSED RESOLUTION: WG expresses its sincere thanks to Dan and Jo
to have lead the boat from start to end!
<Kai> you won't get off that easily :-)
RESOLUTION: WG expresses its sincere thanks to Dan and Jo to have
lead the boat from start to end!
jo: No further calls from the time being.
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
|Free forum by Nabble||Edit this page|