[iri] #125: Clarify scope of scheme specifications to be <scheme-specific-part> only

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[iri] #125: Clarify scope of scheme specifications to be <scheme-specific-part> only

iri issue tracker
#125: Clarify scope of scheme specifications to be <scheme-specific-part> only

 Scheme specifications/registrations seem to have difficulties
 understanding that #fragment is independent of a scheme specification.
 This may need to be clarified.

 See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2012May/0000.html and
 the followup messages in the thread. A specific wording proposal is at
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2012May/0004.html.

--
----------------------+-----------------
 Reporter:  duerst@…  |      Owner:
     Type:  defect    |     Status:  new
 Priority:  minor     |  Milestone:
Component:  4395bis   |    Version:
 Severity:  -         |   Keywords:
----------------------+-----------------

Ticket URL: <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/125>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [iri] #125: Clarify scope of scheme specifications to be <scheme-specific-part> only

Peter Saint-Andre-2
On 5/6/12 8:19 PM, iri issue tracker wrote:

> #125: Clarify scope of scheme specifications to be <scheme-specific-part> only
>
>  Scheme specifications/registrations seem to have difficulties
>  understanding that #fragment is independent of a scheme specification.
>  This may need to be clarified.
>
>  See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2012May/0000.html and
>  the followup messages in the thread. A specific wording proposal is at
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2012May/0004.html.
>

Martin, what is the relationship between this ticket and #126?

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/