[iri] #112: Should IRI-comparison "update" 3986 with respect to comparison

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[iri] #112: Should IRI-comparison "update" 3986 with respect to comparison

iri issue tracker
#112: Should IRI-comparison "update" 3986 with respect to comparison

 RFC 3986 on URIs contains the "ladder" for comparison which was the source
 of iri-comparison. The iri-comparison document makes mainly editorial but
 perhaps normative definitions for comparison which might supercede, so
 perhaps iri-comparison should 'UPDATE' 3986.
 Opinions?

--
------------------------+-----------------------------------------
 Reporter:  masinter@…  |      Owner:  draft-ietf-iri-comparison@…
     Type:  defect      |     Status:  new
 Priority:  major       |  Milestone:
Component:  comparison  |    Version:
 Severity:  -           |   Keywords:
------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/112>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [iri] #112: Should IRI-comparison "update" 3986 with respect to comparison

iri issue tracker
#112: Should IRI-comparison "update" 3986 with respect to comparison


Comment (by masinter@…):

 Alternatively? Consider making this document BCP rather than standards
 track, since it basically gives guidance for protocols and applications
 needing equivalence, and doesn't directly have a scope of application?
 (I'm putting this comment in for completeness since it was in iri-
 comparison, but I don't think this is such a great idea ...)

--
------------------------+------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  masinter@…  |       Owner:  draft-ietf-iri-comparison@…
     Type:  defect      |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major       |   Milestone:
Component:  comparison  |     Version:
 Severity:  -           |  Resolution:
 Keywords:              |
------------------------+------------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/112#comment:1>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [iri] #112: Should IRI-comparison "update" 3986 with respect to comparison

iri issue tracker
In reply to this post by iri issue tracker
#112: Should IRI-comparison "update" 3986 with respect to comparison

Changes (by masinter@…):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => fixed


Comment:

 draft-ietf-iri-comparison now says it "updates" 3986.

--
------------------------+------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  masinter@…  |       Owner:  draft-ietf-iri-comparison@…
     Type:  defect      |      Status:  closed
 Priority:  major       |   Milestone:
Component:  comparison  |     Version:
 Severity:  -           |  Resolution:  fixed
 Keywords:              |
------------------------+------------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/112#comment:2>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>