[iri] #103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[iri] #103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6

iri issue tracker
#103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6

 From Frank Ellermann <[hidden email]>:

 * In section 6 you apparently forgot u+FFFE and u+FFFF.
  Maybe a new term <other-non-char> or similar defined
  in section 5.1 would also help at the end of section 6.

--
------------------------+--------------------------------------
 Reporter:  masinter@…  |      Owner:  draft-ietf-iri-3987bis@…
     Type:  defect      |     Status:  new
 Priority:  minor       |  Milestone:
Component:  3987bis     |    Version:
 Severity:  -           |   Keywords:
------------------------+--------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/103>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [iri] #103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6

Mykyta Yevstifeyev
29.10.2011 21:55, iri issue tracker wrote:
> #103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6
>
>   From Frank Ellermann<[hidden email]>:
>
>   * In section 6 you apparently forgot u+FFFE and u+FFFF.
>    Maybe a new term<other-non-char>  or similar defined
>    in section 5.1 would also help at the end of section 6.

Yes, that's right, u+fffe and u+ffff are non-characters so are to be
included in corresponding bullet of Section 6.  But I don't see what the
proposed new production will stand for; could Frank please explain?

Mykyta Yevstifeyev

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [iri] #103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6

iri issue tracker
In reply to this post by iri issue tracker
#103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6


Comment (by duerst@…):

 (moved from http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/101#comment:1):

 U+FFFE and U+FFFF are not listed because XML excludes them (see
 http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#NT-Char) already. What is now the section on
 "Characters Disallowed or Not Recommended in IRIs" once was part of the
 LEIRI section; this got lost when we tried to deal with HTML(5) issues in
 the same place. My preference is to merge the LEIRI section and
 "Characters Disallowed or Not Recommended in IRIs" and go back to what we
 had agreed to with the XML people beforehand.

--
------------------------+---------------------------------------
 Reporter:  masinter@…  |       Owner:  draft-ietf-iri-3987bis@…
     Type:  defect      |      Status:  new
 Priority:  minor       |   Milestone:
Component:  3987bis     |     Version:
 Severity:  -           |  Resolution:
 Keywords:              |
------------------------+---------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/103#comment:1>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [iri] #103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6

iri issue tracker
In reply to this post by iri issue tracker
#103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6

Changes (by masinter@…):

 * owner:  draft-ietf-iri-3987bis@… => duerst@…


Comment:

 as per 12/27 editor meeting, martin will reinstate LEIRI

--
------------------------+-----------------------
 Reporter:  masinter@…  |       Owner:  duerst@…
     Type:  defect      |      Status:  new
 Priority:  minor       |   Milestone:
Component:  3987bis     |     Version:
 Severity:  -           |  Resolution:
 Keywords:              |
------------------------+-----------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/103#comment:2>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [iri] #103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6

iri issue tracker
In reply to this post by iri issue tracker
#103: u+FFFE and u+FFFF missing in section 6

Changes (by duerst@…):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => fixed


Comment:

 Added some text about U+FFFE-FFFF to "For reference, we here also list the
 code points and code units not even allowed in Legacy Extended IRIs:".

--
------------------------+-----------------------
 Reporter:  masinter@…  |       Owner:  duerst@…
     Type:  defect      |      Status:  closed
 Priority:  minor       |   Milestone:
Component:  3987bis     |     Version:
 Severity:  -           |  Resolution:  fixed
 Keywords:              |
------------------------+-----------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/103#comment:3>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>