> I wanted to check in with you regarding our resolution of ISSUE-109:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/109 >
> Specifically, here's our resolution text:
> "We considered @cite but realized that many other attributes would
> then require RDFa interpretation and that doing so is not simple. We
> defer this issue to a future version of RDFa."
> Is this acceptable from your point of view?
Yes, I agree with that.
Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!!
Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.