@datatype and rdf:XMLLiteral

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

@datatype and rdf:XMLLiteral

Dan Connolly
in step 9 of http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#sec_5.5. I see:

"@datatype is present, and does not have an empty value, and is not set
to rdf:XMLLiteral."

Is "set to" used in the sense of string literals or expanded names?

suppose I bind xyz: to the RDF namespace and use
 datatype="xyz:XMLLiteral"

Does that count?

Is there a relevant test case? if not, please add one.

--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: @datatype and rdf:XMLLiteral

Mark Birbeck-4
Yes, it should be in the sense of an expanded name. Good idea to add a TC.

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Dan Connolly <[hidden email]> wrote:

> in step 9 of http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#sec_5.5. I see:
>
> "@datatype is present, and does not have an empty value, and is not set
> to rdf:XMLLiteral."
>
> Is "set to" used in the sense of string literals or expanded names?
>
> suppose I bind xyz: to the RDF namespace and use
>  datatype="xyz:XMLLiteral"
>
> Does that count?
>
> Is there a relevant test case? if not, please add one.
>
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>
>
>