[WICD] scope editorial

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[WICD] scope editorial

Anne van Kesteren-2

I have the following editorial remarks regarding  
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WICD-20051219/#scope>:
* "eXtensible" should be "Extensible"
* Why is SVG Tiny mentioned specifically?


--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [WICD] scope editorial

Steve K Speicher

"Anne van Kesteren" <[hidden email]> wrote on 01/20/2006 01:30:51 PM:

>
> I have the following editorial remarks regarding
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WICD-20051219/#scope>:
> * "eXtensible" should be "Extensible"
> * Why is SVG Tiny mentioned specifically?
>

Anne,
Thanks for these comments.

We will change:
  - "eXtensible" to "Extensible"
  - "SVG Tiny" to "SVG"

Let us know if within two weeks if this does not appropriately address
your comment.

Regards,
Steve Speicher

ACTION-374

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [WICD] scope editorial

Anne van Kesteren-2

On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:49:12 +0100, Steve K Speicher <[hidden email]>  
wrote:
> We will change:
>   - "eXtensible" to "Extensible"
>   - "SVG Tiny" to "SVG"

This satisfies my comment. Thanks!


> ACTION-374


--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>