Validator - WTF!!

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Validator - WTF!!

Mr. Terje Lea
Dear W3.org

When the validator service can't validate a perfectly good channel-tagging

like
<channel>
</channel>

This is just LOW!!!

Get the sh*theads out of there!

Sincerely yours,
TL
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Validator - WTF!!

Karl Dubost-3
Hi,

you might want your mails to [hidden email] when it is related to the validators.

Le 27 sept. 2010 à 21:05, Mr. Terje Lea a écrit :
> When the validator service can't validate a perfectly good channel-tagging
>
> like
> <channel>
> </channel>

Did you mean "check the well formedness".
Which document format are you trying to validate against?
Which validator are you trying to use? (URL)

You might want to use for checking the well formedness of your markup.
http://www.xmlvalidation.com/


--
Karl Dubost
Montréal, QC, Canada
http://www.la-grange.net/karl/


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Validator - WTF!!

Etan Wexler
In reply to this post by Mr. Terje Lea
Sometimes the classics put it best, my dear Mr. Terje Lea.

http://web.archive.org/web/19990204033611/students.missouri.edu/~ahicks/year3/oct1697.htm