[Timesheets LC comment] Relationships to Other Specifications

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Timesheets LC comment] Relationships to Other Specifications

Doug Schepers-3

Dear SYMM WG-

This is a Last Call review comment from the SVG WG on the SMIL
Timesheets 1.0 specification, W3C Working Draft 10 January 2008,
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-timesheets-20080110/ .  Please let us know
if you have any questions by replying to [hidden email].


1 Introduction

"An alternative to Timesheets is XHTML+SMIL [XHTMLplusSMIL] which gives
full SMIL functionality as in-line in non-SMIL XML documents. On the
other hand, SMIL itself gives full SMIL functionality as in-line
XML-based document."

The wording here is unclear, and seems to undermine the need for
timesheets when XHTML+SMIL already exists.  Can you please clarify?  The
first example seems to imply that timesheets can be used inline or
externally, but this passages seems to counterindicate that.

Also, what is the relationship of Timesheets and XHTML+SMIL to
HTML+Time? [1]

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-HTMLplusTIME




Regards-
-Doug Schepers, on behalf of the SVG WG