Thank you, was -- {RE: terminology section and diagram for ext/versioning}

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Thank you, was -- {RE: terminology section and diagram for ext/versioning}

David Ezell

Thanks everyone for using the public list.

That really helps us (me) a lot.

Best regards,
David Ezell

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Dan Connolly
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:22 PM
To: David Orchard
Cc: [hidden email]; W3C TAG
Subject: Re: terminology section and diagram for ext/versioning


On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 11:57 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
[...]
> I just checked them in and generated RDF:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.png
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.rdf
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.violet
> revision 1.1
> date: 2006/02/14 17:36:59;  author: connolly;  state: Exp;

I made some edits:

----------
revision 1.2
date: 2006/02/15 01:53:13;  author: connolly;  state: Exp;  lines: +87
-75
changes to UML diagram:
- factored Communication out of Production/Consuption; moved common
language/text associations

- removed space from XML Vocabulary name to make it fragment-friendly

- fixed direction of Constraint generalizations
----------

still working on this other stuff...

> and I'm starting to review it w.r.t. some earlier work I did on change

> policies...
>
> [VM] formally defining W3C's namespace change policy options w.r.t.
> recent TAG versioning terminology
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Sep/0136
>
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/util/changePolicy.n3

--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E