Re: xml:base="relative-value" underspecified

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: xml:base="relative-value" underspecified

Grosso, Paul

Thank you for your comments at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008JulSep/
0002
on the XML Base Second Edition PER.

You point out that the discussion of LEIRIs in IRI-bis
does not define a LEIRI Reference and thus you wonder
how to interpret a relative value for xml:base.

The XML Core WG has reviewed this comment and decided not
to make any change to XML Base Second Edition with the
following explanation:

Good point, but one that needs to be addressed in IRI-bis,
not in XML Base.  We have already discussed this with the
editors of IRI-bis, and they have agreed to augment IRI-bis
with a definition of LEIRI Reference.

See also
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008JulSep/
0003
for previous reponses.

We hope to transition XML Base to Recommendation within
the next few weeks.  Please let us know if you accept
our disposition of this comment as soon as feasible.
If we have not heard by September 22, we will assume
you have no objection to our resolution.

Paul Grosso
for the XML Core WG

Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: xml:base="relative-value" underspecified

Liam R. E. Quin

On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:31:20PM -0400, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> Good point, but one that needs to be addressed in IRI-bis,
> not in XML Base.  We have already discussed this with the
> editors of IRI-bis, and they have agreed to augment IRI-bis
> with a definition of LEIRI Reference.

I am satisfied with this resolution.

Thank you.

Liam

--
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/

Loading...