Re: [iri] #91: Mapping of <ireg-name>: preferred way?
#91: Mapping of <ireg-name>: preferred way?
Changes (by masinter@…):
* owner: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis@… => masinter@…
I propose resolving this by being more specific about exactly when
punicode encoding is acceptable, by changing
<t>The ireg-name component MAY also be converted as follows:</t>
<t>In situations where it is certain that the ireg-name is intended to be
used as a domain name to be processed by Domain Name Lookup (as per <xref
target="RFC53891"/>, an alternative method MAY may be used for converting
the ireg-name component as follows: </t>