Re: [iri] #27: do we need to say anything special about ZWNJ and ZWJ?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [iri] #27: do we need to say anything special about ZWNJ and ZWJ?

iri issue tracker
#27: do we need to say anything special about ZWNJ and ZWJ?


Comment (by duerst@…):

 I propose the following text, to be added in the section "Limitations on
 UCS Characters Allowed in IRIs":


 {{{
 --- C:/Users/duerst/AppData/Local/Temp/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis.xml-
 revBASE.svn000.tmp.xml        木 3  1 19:10:21 2012
 +++ C:/Data/ietf-iri/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis.xml  木
 3  1 19:38:04 2012
 @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
  <!ENTITY rfc3987 SYSTEM
 "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3987.xml">
  <!ENTITY rfc5890 SYSTEM
 "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5890.xml">
  <!ENTITY rfc5891 SYSTEM
 "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5891.xml">
 +<!ENTITY rfc5892 SYSTEM
 "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5892.xml">
  <!ENTITY rfc6055 SYSTEM
 "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6055.xml">
  <!ENTITY rfc6082 SYSTEM
 "http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6082.xml">
  ]>
 @@ -930,6 +931,13 @@
      includes many look-alikes of "space", "delims", and "unwise",
      characters excluded in <xref target="RFC3491"/>.</t>

 +  <t hangText='d.'>The ZERO WIDTH NON-JOINER (U+200C) and ZERO WIDTH
 +    JOINER (U+200D) are invisible in most contexts, but are crucial in
 +    some very limited contexts. Appendix A of <xref target="RFC5892"/>
 +    contains contextual restrictions for these and some other characters.
 +    The use of these characters are strongly discouraged except
 +    in the relevant contexts.</t>
 +
  </list>
  </t>

 @@ -1734,6 +1742,7 @@

  &rfc5890;
  &rfc5891;
 +&rfc5892;

  <reference anchor="UNIV6">
  <front>
 }}}

--
----------------------+-----------------------
 Reporter:  duerst@…  |       Owner:  duerst@…
     Type:  defect    |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major     |   Milestone:
Component:  3987bis   |     Version:
 Severity:  -         |  Resolution:
 Keywords:            |
----------------------+-----------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/27#comment:5>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [iri] #27: do we need to say anything special about ZWNJ and ZWJ?

iri issue tracker
#27: do we need to say anything special about ZWNJ and ZWJ?

Changes (by duerst@…):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => fixed


Comment:

 Addressed by applying commit 98 as described in comment 5.

--
----------------------+-----------------------
 Reporter:  duerst@…  |       Owner:  duerst@…
     Type:  defect    |      Status:  closed
 Priority:  major     |   Milestone:
Component:  3987bis   |     Version:
 Severity:  -         |  Resolution:  fixed
 Keywords:            |
----------------------+-----------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/27#comment:6>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>