Re: Your comments on Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 3.0) ( LC-1793)

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your comments on Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 3.0) ( LC-1793)

Thierry Michel


 Dear Marcin Hanclik ,

The SYMM Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the Last
Call Working Draft [2] of the Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language
(SMIL 3.0) published on 13 Jul 2007. Thank you for having taken the time to
review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at [hidden email] if
you agree with it or not before 02 nov 2007. In case of disagreement, you
are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus
with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will
be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be
reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the
next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the SYMM Working Group,
Thierry Michel
W3C Staff Contact

 1.
http://www.w3.org/mid/78BEBE845AB46D4789206C4DBB3A969C651F26@...
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-SMIL3-20070713/


=====

Your comment on Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL
3.0)...:

> Dear Group,
>
>  
>
> I hope I do not ask any old well-known question...
>
> Was it intentional not to refer to RFC2119 when specifying the
> required
> and recommended features in the SMIL3.0 specification?
>
>
> I have reviewed a few chapters and there are statements like "are
> required to be supported" or "is recommended to be supported".
>
> RFC2119 terms are however used in XML, XHTML etc specs that referred
> to
> in SMIL3.0.
>
> Thanks.


Working Group Resolution (LC-1793):
The group has identified a few hundreds of required modifications related
to your comments.
Each of the proposed changes has to be reviewed by the human to ensure the
quality of the specification.
Therefore the group targets the following schedule:
- the Working Group will prepare corresponding changes on the best-effort
basis within the CR time frame and
- the Working Group will modify the specification until its final version
is published.


----



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Your comments on Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 3.0) ( LC-1793)

Thierry Michel


 Dear Marcin Hanclik ,

The SYMM Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the Last
Call Working Draft [2] of the Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language
(SMIL 3.0) published on 13 Jul 2007. Thank you for having taken the time to
review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at [hidden email] if
you agree with it or not before 02 nov 2007. In case of disagreement, you
are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus
with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will
be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be
reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the
next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the SYMM Working Group,
Thierry Michel
W3C Staff Contact

 1.
http://www.w3.org/mid/78BEBE845AB46D4789206C4DBB3A969C651F26@...
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-SMIL3-20070713/


=====

Your comment on Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL
3.0)...:

> Dear Group,
>
>  
>
> I hope I do not ask any old well-known question...
>
> Was it intentional not to refer to RFC2119 when specifying the
> required
> and recommended features in the SMIL3.0 specification?
>
>
> I have reviewed a few chapters and there are statements like "are
> required to be supported" or "is recommended to be supported".
>
> RFC2119 terms are however used in XML, XHTML etc specs that referred
> to
> in SMIL3.0.
>
> Thanks.


Working Group Resolution (LC-1793):
The group has identified a few hundreds of required modifications related
to your comments.
Each of the proposed changes has to be reviewed by the human to ensure the
quality of the specification.
Therefore the group targets the following schedule:
- the Working Group will prepare corresponding changes on the best-effort
basis within the CR time frame and
- the Working Group will modify the specification until its final version
is published.


----



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Your comments on Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 3.0) ( LC-1793)

Marcin Hanclik

Dear SYMM Group,

I am satisfied with your response.
Thank you.

Kind regards,
Marcin

Marcin Hanclik  |  Department Manager
Product Development
ACCESS Systems Europe GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452  |  Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: [hidden email]



-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf
Of [hidden email]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 12:29 PM
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Your comments on Synchronized Multimedia Integration
Language (SMIL 3.0) ( LC-1793)



 Dear Marcin Hanclik ,

The SYMM Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the
Last
Call Working Draft [2] of the Synchronized Multimedia Integration
Language
(SMIL 3.0) published on 13 Jul 2007. Thank you for having taken the time
to
review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at [hidden email]
if
you agree with it or not before 02 nov 2007. In case of disagreement,
you
are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a
consensus
with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will
be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be
reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the
next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the SYMM Working Group,
Thierry Michel
W3C Staff Contact

 1.
http://www.w3.org/mid/78BEBE845AB46D4789206C4DBB3A969C651F26@...
.access-company.com
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-SMIL3-20070713/


=====

Your comment on Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL
3.0)...:

> Dear Group,
>
>  
>
> I hope I do not ask any old well-known question...
>
> Was it intentional not to refer to RFC2119 when specifying the
> required
> and recommended features in the SMIL3.0 specification?
>
>
> I have reviewed a few chapters and there are statements like "are
> required to be supported" or "is recommended to be supported".
>
> RFC2119 terms are however used in XML, XHTML etc specs that referred
> to
> in SMIL3.0.
>
> Thanks.


Working Group Resolution (LC-1793):
The group has identified a few hundreds of required modifications
related
to your comments.
Each of the proposed changes has to be reviewed by the human to ensure
the
quality of the specification.
Therefore the group targets the following schedule:
- the Working Group will prepare corresponding changes on the
best-effort
basis within the CR time frame and
- the Working Group will modify the specification until its final
version
is published.


----