Re: XForms 1.1 - repeat relevance & editorial tweaks.

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: XForms 1.1 - repeat relevance & editorial tweaks.

John Boyer

Hi Vlad,

Per our verbal discussion, the repeat itself does not get the enabled/disabled events because it does not have a single node binding.

However, each of the implicit groups representing rows of the table would receive these events because they do have a single node binding.  And those events would bubble up to the repeat.

Regarding the typo in 8.1.1, it is fixed.

Regarding the link, it is intended to work when the document is officially published by the W3C, so it does not work when the document is placed at the working group editorial location.

Can you please reply to this email to indicate whether you are satisfied with the reply or whether you have any further concerns.

Thanks,
John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications
Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
IBM Victoria Software Lab
E-Mail: [hidden email]  

Blog:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
Blog RSS feed:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw




From: Vlad Trakhtenberg/CanWest/IBM
To: [hidden email], [hidden email]
Cc: [hidden email], John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA
Date: 03/12/2009 05:13 PM
Subject: XForms 1.1 - repeat relevance & editorial tweaks.




Dear WG,


Is there a compelling reason for the provision that xforms-disabled/enabled event cannot target repeat (4.4.1 -4.4.11) and repeat control cannot be relevant or non-relevant (8.1.1)?

Perhaps a repeat can become non-relevant'(relevant)  and the  xforms-disabled (enabled ) fire when it does not have any (has at least one) relevant repeat items (item)?

And a couple of minor issues:

1. Typo in 8.1.1: Second bullet:
...
Note:
Form controls that read or write simpleContent produce this exception whenever and as soon as they are bound to an element node that an element child node.

2. The very first link: (not terribly useful ;) http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-xforms11-20090311/  does not work.

Regards,
Vlad Trakhtenberg.


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: XForms 1.1 - repeat relevance & editorial tweaks.

Vlad Trakhtenberg

Thanks for your reply. I accept WG's argumentation and decision. Vlad Trakhtenberg.



John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: [hidden email]

11/06/2009 08:02

To
Vlad Trakhtenberg/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA
cc
[hidden email], [hidden email], [hidden email]
Subject
Re: XForms 1.1 - repeat relevance & editorial tweaks.






Hi Vlad,


Per our verbal discussion, the repeat itself does not get the enabled/disabled events because it does not have a single node binding.


However, each of the implicit groups representing rows of the table would receive these events because they do have a single node binding.  And those events would bubble up to the repeat.


Regarding the typo in 8.1.1, it is fixed.


Regarding the link, it is intended to work when the document is officially published by the W3C, so it does not work when the document is placed at the working group editorial location.


Can you please reply to this email to indicate whether you are satisfied with the reply or whether you have any further concerns.


Thanks,

John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications
Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
IBM Victoria Software Lab
E-Mail: [hidden email]  

Blog:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
Blog RSS feed:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw



From: Vlad Trakhtenberg/CanWest/IBM
To: [hidden email], [hidden email]
Cc: [hidden email], John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA
Date: 03/12/2009 05:13 PM
Subject: XForms 1.1 - repeat relevance & editorial tweaks.





Dear WG,



Is there a compelling reason for the provision that xforms-disabled/enabled event cannot target repeat (4.4.1 -4.4.11) and repeat control cannot be relevant or non-relevant (8.1.1)?


Perhaps a repeat can become non-relevant'(relevant)  and the  xforms-disabled (enabled ) fire when it does not have any (has at least one) relevant repeat items (item)?


And a couple of minor issues:


1. Typo in 8.1.1: Second bullet:

...

Note:

Form controls that read or write simpleContent produce this exception whenever and as soon as they are bound to an element node that an element child node.

2. The very first link: (not terribly useful ;)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-xforms11-20090311/  does not work.

Regards,

Vlad Trakhtenberg.