> It's been a week and a half since the original message was posted, but
> I had to discuss this with the other appsawg chairs, the ftpext2
> chairs, and the Applications ADs.
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Sorry for cross-posting to 6 addresses :-); please send all your comments to
>> [hidden email].
> No, please do not. This document is NOT to be discussed on apps-discuss.
> 1. It will not be processed in the appsawg.
> 2. The ftpext2 chairs have told me that it will not be processed in
> ftpext2. It is not in their charter, and the WG is not interested in
> rechartering to add it.
> 3. The Apps ADs have told me that they will not sponsor it as an
> individual submission.
> In other words, as an IETF document, this is dead. There is
> insufficient energy and interest in the IETF to hash this document
> out. Please do not continue work on this document. In any case,
> please do not discuss it on the apps-discuss mailing list.
I'm very unlikely to stop working on the document. Anyway, nothing in
your message disallows me to wait for better times, when the situation
> Barry Leiba, appsawg chair
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>> Title : The'ftp' URI Scheme
>>> Author(s) : Mykyta Yevstifeyev
>>> Filename : draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme-05.txt
>>> Pages : 29
>>> Date : 2011-07-24
>>> This document specifies the'ftp' Uniform Resource Identifier
>>> scheme, which is used to refer to resources accessible via File
>>> Transfer Protocol (FTP). It updates RFC 959 and RFC 1738.
>>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme-05.txt > _______________________________________________
> Uri-review mailing list
> [hidden email] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review >