Re: New attribute typemustmatch

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New attribute typemustmatch

Shelley Powers
I found the WhatWG discussion, if you can call it that.

http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-June/032023.html

What are the procedures in place to control change during Last Call?


Shelley

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New attribute typemustmatch

Michael A. Peters-2
Shelley Powers wrote:
> I found the WhatWG discussion, if you can call it that.
>
> http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-June/032023.html
>
> What are the procedures in place to control change during Last Call?
>
>
> Shelley
>

For what it is worth, I don't think the content of the html document is
the place for security restrictions.

It is better to do it via something like FireFox's "Content Security
Policy" proposal, though I'm not sure if it currently covers ensuring
mime types of served object match the object description.

http://people.mozilla.com/~bsterne/content-security-policy/

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New attribute typemustmatch

Sam Ruby-2
In reply to this post by Shelley Powers
On 06/14/2011 01:18 AM, Shelley Powers wrote:
> I found the WhatWG discussion, if you can call it that.
>
> http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-June/032023.html
>
> What are the procedures in place to control change during Last Call?

I encourage people who wish to do so to comment on the following bug:

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12734#c8

I've seeded the discussion with a link to these comments.

> Shelley

- Sam Ruby


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New attribute typemustmatch

Shelley Powers
In reply to this post by Shelley Powers
So that means the change should be reverted? How does one ask for a
change to be reverted if one is not a member of the group?

Shelley