RE: small problems in part 1 appendix C

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: small problems in part 1 appendix C

Jonathan Marsh-2

Thank you for these issues.  We tracked them as Issue 4492 [1] and Issue
4493 [2] in our short Last Call period.  The Working Group added the
constraint "No xmlns() pointer part defines a namespace for the
targetNamespace of the WSDL 2.0 document" [3], and corrected the prefix as
requested [4].

Since you were present (IIRC) during the discussion, we assume you agree
with the resolution of these issues.

[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4492
[2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4493
[3]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-
type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#component-designator-canonical-form
[4]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-
type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#Iri-ref-ex

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On
> Behalf Of Jacek Kopecky
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 8:20 AM
> To: WS-Description WG
> Subject: small problems in part 1 appendix C
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> implementing the RDF mapping, I'm also implementing the creation of the
> fragment identifiers and I found the following small (maybe editorial)
> problems in Appendix C:
>
> 1) the canonical form does not say that no xmlns() pointer part should
> define the namespace same as the namespace of the WSDL 2.0 document, so
> it doesn't seem that the following would be uncanonical, while it
> should
> be:
> http://example.com/wsdl#
>     xmlns(ns1=http://example.com/wsdl#)
>     wsdl.interfaceFaultReference(iface/op/In/ns1:Foo)
>
> 2) example c-2 has a typo, it declares namespace prefix ns1 but uses
> xsTicketAgent in the fifth IRI
>
> Jacek