RE: Semantics of {http cookies} Property.

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Semantics of {http cookies} Property.

Jonathan Marsh-2

Thank you for this comment.  The Working Group this issue as a CR110 [1].

The latest editor's draft [2] adds text and an assertion about the meaning
of cookies="true".  For your second point, the test "MAY indicate" was
changed to "can indicate" [3].

Unless you let us know otherwise within 2 weeks, we will assume you agree
with the resolution of this issue.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR110
[2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html
?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#http-cookies-decl

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On
> Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 3:06 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Semantics of {http cookies} Property.
>
>
> This came up at the interop event in Dinard:
>
> 1. The spec is unclear.[1] What is the meaning of the {http cookies}
> property?
>
> Does is state whether the service will send cookies or whether the
> client needs to understand cookies.
>
> I recommend that it mean that the service uses cookies in some meaning
> way and that the client will be unable to use the service effectively
> unless it supports cookies.
>
> 2. The spec is inconsistent. It says Binding components MAY indicate
> ..., and also that the property is REQUIRED.
>
> The XML attribute is optional, but the property is REQUIRED.
> Therefore, a Binding  component MUST indicate...
>
> [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-
> adjuncts.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#http-cookies-decl
>
> -- Arthur