RE: More Duplicate and Non-Assertions

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: More Duplicate and Non-Assertions

Jonathan Marsh-2

Thank you for this comments.  The Working Group has resolved these issues as follows:

 

Unless you let us know otherwise by the end of January, we will assume you agree with the resolution of these issues.

 


From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Lawrence Mandel
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:35 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: More Duplicate and Non-Assertions

 


Duplicates:

1. InterfaceOperation-1204000
This xs:anyURI MUST be an absolute IRI (see [IETF RFC 3987]).

InterfaceOperation-1204002
Its value MUST be an absolute IRI (see [IETF RFC 3987]).

The Working Group tracked this comment as CR105 [1].  The Working Group removed the assertion markup for InterfaceOperation-1204002, see [2].

 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR105

[2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#Interfaceoperation_pattern_attribute

 

2. InterfaceOperation-1204001
These xs:anyURIs MUST be absolute IRIs (see [IETF RFC 3986]).

InterfaceOperation-1204003
Its value MUST be an absolute IRI (see [IETF RFC 3987]).

The Working Group tracked this comment as CR106 [3].  The Working Group removed the assertion markup for InterfaceOperation-1204003, see [4].

 

[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR106

[4] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#InterfaceOperation_style_attribute

 

 

Non-Assertion:

1. InterfaceOpeation-0038
An Interface Operation component MUST satisfy the specification defined by each operation style identified by its {style} property.

LM: There is nothing to check here. The styles defined in the adjuncts document all specify that in order to use them all the rules must be followed.

The Working Group tracked this comment as CR107 [5].  The Working Group did not make a change to the spec, as the constraint that ALL styles are in effect isn’t captured elsewhere in the spec.

 

[5] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR107  

 

 

 



Thanks,

Lawrence Mandel

Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814   Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
[hidden email]