Thank you for this issue. We tracked it as Issue 4421 
in our short Last Call period. The Working Group renamed section 1.1 to “Web
Service” to “Service Description” , fixed the incorrect prefix in 1.4.5 ,
and changed “At the abstract level” to “At a high level” .
The spec should be in Proposed Recommendation shortly, if you
disagree with the resolution of this issue please inform us as soon as
From:[hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Ramkumar
Menon Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 10:23 AM To: www-ws-desc Subject: Editorial Issues - Part 1
Please find the following editorial issues that I find in
1) Why is 1.1 titled "Web Service" ? It does not
describe what a Web Service is. It describes in summary on how WSDL describes a
Web Service. Perhaps it should be titled "Service Description"
or something on those lines
2) 1.4.5 --> Inlined Schema
statement - "An XML schema that is defined in the xs:types element
information item of a WSDL 2.0 description."
suggestion - It should be "wsdl:types"
and not "xs:types".
3) Section 2.1.1
Statement in the spec :- "At the abstract level,
the Description component is just a container for two categories of components:
WSDL 2.0 components and type system components.WSDL 2.0 components are
interfaces, bindings and services. ".
Suggestion :- This gives a message that bindings
and services exist at the abstract level. Is it true ? Moreover, the first
sentence seems to suggest that the later part of the section will go and quote
the Description component at the concrete level - which is missing .
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!