Re: No use of deprecated SCOVO in Service Description example
On 12/14/2012 03:59 AM, Jerven Bolleman wrote:
> Dear Workgroup,
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-service-description/#example defines a
> prefix/namespace for the scovo ontology. The Scovo vocabulary is
> deprecated and is not used in the examples.
> Removing the prefix namespace declaration does not change the
> technical impact of the normative example. Just reduces a minor source
> of confusion.
> Sincere regards and thanks for moving the standard forward,
> Jerven Bolleman
Thanks for pointing this out. It's now been fixed in the editor's
draft  and will be fixed in the next published version.