Nope, I hadn't; I'm not sure I'll have time to reply to that survey in
any reasonable time, but feel free to notice the relevant persons that
the W3C Glossary is relying on SKOS (or at least some version of it - I
haven't followed the possible recent evolutions of the vocabulary).
> The note in
> http://www.w3.org/QA/2003/01/Glossary says
> """it's now using the SKOS Schema produced by the SWAD-EU activity as
> much as possible, instead of the custom schema it was using until now."""
> Now would probably be a good time to revisit any issues with SKOS that
> you had... (apologies if I've missed a mail thread on that)
I don't think that beyond the hypertext fragment thingy we noticed any
real problem with SKOS...