Adam Connors wrote:
> I have just uploaded a new draft of MWABP, incorporating mostly the
> editorial changes discussed in the last editorial meeting and a couple
> of simple updates related to the LC comments.
> Regarding the other LC comments I'm not sure what requires a resolution
> or not so we'll have to discuss in the next call, but I figured I should
> get this out in preparation for next wk.
A group resolution is basically needed for each and every last call
comment, for tracking purpose.
> @Francois -- what happens next ? Should this be published as an update
> to the LC version (the links will need fixing, I wasn't sure what format
> they would take once the LC was updated) ?
This is an editor's draft to support the group's discussions. The
published Last Call document is to remain as it stands and won't be
updated to point to this document. Discussions during the F2F should end
up with one of:
1. let's publish another Last Call as we've decided to make some
substantive changes to the document.
2. let's progress to Candidate Recommendation as we think the document
is stable and changes made since publication as Last Call are editorial
I have updated the draft in place (a refresh might be needed) to point
out that it is an editor's draft (stylesheet updated and warning in the
Status of This Document added), have updated the links to previous and
latest versions and added a link to the diff.