Mobile Web Application Best Practices is now a Candidate Recommendation

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Mobile Web Application Best Practices is now a Candidate Recommendation

Francois Daoust
Great news!

The Mobile Web Application Best Practices has been published as a W3C
Candidate Recommendation:

  http://www.w3.org/TR/mwabp/
  (permanent link: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/CR-mwabp-20100211/ )

The Candidate Recommendation exit criteria are those agreed upon within
the group:

1.  Sufficient reports of implementation experience have been gathered
to demonstrate that the Mobile Web Application Best Practices are
implementable and are interpreted in a consistent manner. To test this,
the Working Group expects to evaluate Web content (Web sites, pages)
that has been created using the Mobile Web Application Best Practices.
To exit "Candidate Recommendation" for each Best Practice, at least two
Web sites/pages which are not solely demonstrations of Best Practices
implementations should pass the Best Practice.

2. An implementation report has been produced indicating the results of
using each best practice for the Web sites/pages considered


The implementation report template should be used to provide
implementation feedback:
  http://www.w3.org/2010/01/mwabp-implementation-report-template

Please consider filling out one (or more!) implementation report(s)
based on Web application(s) you may have developed. Thanks for passing
the word out as well. The specification now cannot move forward without
evidence that the Best Practices are implemented.

Congratulations Adam, as editor!
Congratulations to the Working Group, another step forward ;)

Note that I wrote a short post on the BPWG blog to advertise the
publication:
http://www.w3.org/blog/BPWG/2010/02/11/mobile_web_application_best_practices_is

Francois.


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Mobile Web Application Best Practices is now a Candidate Recommendation

전종홍
Dear all,

I have found a minor editorial error:
 
 In section 3.5.8, "(5.5.1 Thematic consistency) " is wrong section number.
 
 Thematic Consistency part in MWBP, is section 5.1.1  

--- Jonathan Jeon

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Francois Daoust
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 7:27 AM
To: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG
Subject: Mobile Web Application Best Practices is now a Candidate Recommendation


Great news!

The Mobile Web Application Best Practices has been published as a W3C
Candidate Recommendation:

  http://www.w3.org/TR/mwabp/ 
  (permanent link: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/CR-mwabp-20100211/ )

The Candidate Recommendation exit criteria are those agreed upon within
the group:

1.  Sufficient reports of implementation experience have been gathered
to demonstrate that the Mobile Web Application Best Practices are
implementable and are interpreted in a consistent manner. To test this,
the Working Group expects to evaluate Web content (Web sites, pages)
that has been created using the Mobile Web Application Best Practices.
To exit "Candidate Recommendation" for each Best Practice, at least two
Web sites/pages which are not solely demonstrations of Best Practices
implementations should pass the Best Practice.

2. An implementation report has been produced indicating the results of
using each best practice for the Web sites/pages considered


The implementation report template should be used to provide
implementation feedback:
  http://www.w3.org/2010/01/mwabp-implementation-report-template

Please consider filling out one (or more!) implementation report(s)
based on Web application(s) you may have developed. Thanks for passing
the word out as well. The specification now cannot move forward without
evidence that the Best Practices are implemented.

Congratulations Adam, as editor!
Congratulations to the Working Group, another step forward ;)

Note that I wrote a short post on the BPWG blog to advertise the
publication:
http://www.w3.org/blog/BPWG/2010/02/11/mobile_web_application_best_practices_is 

Francois.


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Mobile Web Application Best Practices is now a Candidate Recommendation

Adam Connors
Thanks Jonathan. I suspect we'll find a few of these over the next few months so I'll batch them up into the next iteration.

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:59 AM, 전종홍 <[hidden email]> wrote:
Dear all,

I have found a minor editorial error:

 In section 3.5.8, "(5.5.1 Thematic consistency) " is wrong section number.

 Thematic Consistency part in MWBP, is section 5.1.1

--- Jonathan Jeon

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Francois Daoust
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 7:27 AM
To: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG
Subject: Mobile Web Application Best Practices is now a Candidate Recommendation


Great news!

The Mobile Web Application Best Practices has been published as a W3C
Candidate Recommendation:

 http://www.w3.org/TR/mwabp/
 (permanent link: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/CR-mwabp-20100211/ )

The Candidate Recommendation exit criteria are those agreed upon within
the group:

1.  Sufficient reports of implementation experience have been gathered
to demonstrate that the Mobile Web Application Best Practices are
implementable and are interpreted in a consistent manner. To test this,
the Working Group expects to evaluate Web content (Web sites, pages)
that has been created using the Mobile Web Application Best Practices.
To exit "Candidate Recommendation" for each Best Practice, at least two
Web sites/pages which are not solely demonstrations of Best Practices
implementations should pass the Best Practice.

2. An implementation report has been produced indicating the results of
using each best practice for the Web sites/pages considered


The implementation report template should be used to provide
implementation feedback:
 http://www.w3.org/2010/01/mwabp-implementation-report-template

Please consider filling out one (or more!) implementation report(s)
based on Web application(s) you may have developed. Thanks for passing
the word out as well. The specification now cannot move forward without
evidence that the Best Practices are implemented.

Congratulations Adam, as editor!
Congratulations to the Working Group, another step forward ;)

Note that I wrote a short post on the BPWG blog to advertise the
publication:
http://www.w3.org/blog/BPWG/2010/02/11/mobile_web_application_best_practices_is

Francois.