minutes from today's call are now available:
and copied below for tracker's searching
- DRAFT -
Databinding WG Teleconference
21 Nov 2006
See also: IRC log
Vladislav Bezrukov (SAP AG)
George Cowe (Origo Services Limited)
Paul Downey (BT)
Yves Lafon (W3C)
2. Status of our Last Call WD
3. Publication of First Public WD of Advanced
4. Test Suite and Detection
5. ISSUE-65: Why would a pattern NOT be included in our Advanced
* Summary of Action Items
<trackbot> Date: 21 November 2006
<scribe> Scribe: pauld
no objections to approving minutes from the 14th
Status of our Last Call WD
pauld: please review, I think editing is mostly complete
george: is there anything missing?
yves: moritorium starts tomorrow night
... can publish if we have it in time
pauld: quite a few editorial changes, highlight patterns in orange,
more narative text and hightlight elements and attributes matched in
... may have overstepped the mark with ISSUE-96 and the
george: we can remove it if there is a problem with tools
pauld: or we could remove it now, we don't have good coverage only
what we're interested in as a small WG
george: wasn't my intention for ISSUE-96, but it's OK to include it
under that issue
pauld: let's go with this pattern included
... please read the spec and flag editorial nits asap
vlad: what happens if we have more patterns
pauld: if you want them as basic submit them as LC comments
vlad: advanced should be OK
pauld: end of LC on the 5th?
yves: 12th seems better
pauld: OK 12th it is
<vladB> +1 to Yves
pauld: review, thinking of asking XMLSchema WG
pauld: we need the test suite page for them
yves: for basic they're important, it's a heads-up
pauld: WS-I Basic Profile, and WSDL WG
... CG call later, can fix it there
Publication of First Public WD of Advanced
pauld: OK to publish our first public WD of advanced?
... short link for advanced spec?
we have http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-patterns/
pauld: let's publish to coincide with our LCWD of Basic.
Test Suite and Detection
george: we're ok if it doesn't follow import and include
pauld: might be interesting to have the detector highlight imports and
includes as links
george: how long before we have a validation service?
yves: we have a mechnism to run servlets
pauld: we need to make sure it doesn't blow up on unknowns
<scribe> ACTION: gcowe to develop W3C detection service with help from
Yves [recorded in
<trackbot> Created ACTION-90 - Develop W3C detection service with help
from Yves [on George Cowe - due 2006-11-28].
pauld: been collecting schemas from the wild , will publish a report
... test suite, we have Python ZSI on the matrix
yves: i've been working on the test client, going to have to go
through an XSLT path, still in progress
pauld: do you need more metadata in the examples.xml?
yves: will need help for float
... probably just do simple XML equality, then add manual tests as
pauld: possible to schema validate the responses?
... vlad, can you consider adding your own implementation to our
ISSUE-65: Why would a pattern NOT be included in our Advanced document?
pauld: we could go for 100% coverage of XML Schema 1.0, but we'll be
here a long time
... maybe my farming of schemas to drive patterns
george: sounds like a sensible approach, look for how people are
pauld: how will we know when we're done?
yves: when as a WG we agre we're done
pauld: maybe a time driven process?
... or hopefully we'll get lots from LC comments
... how can we get people to submit their schemas to look for patterns
... worries about missing schemas which are not public, or freely
available (hidden inside Zip or msi files behind a ULA)
george: maybe we should ask for contributions
pauld: how do we find vertical organisations?
george: that's the problem
yves: problem is people have schemas which don't work with tools?
pauld: yes, and we can be unaware of them
... we need to call for implementations *and* schemas to drive
vlad: can try to contribute schemas generated by our implementation
pauld: do SAP have other Schemas and WSDLs we can add to our list
<vladB> i have to find out
pauld: schema filetype:xsd site:w3.org in google is great!
... so it sounds like our bar is a pattern has to be demonstated to be
in use in the wild
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: gcowe to develop W3C detection service with help from
Yves [recorded in
[End of minutes]
|Free forum by Nabble||Edit this page|