Section 9.10.6 of RFC 4918 doesn't mandate those headers to be included, but I don't think it is forbidden to include them. Even when considering the PUT method as an anology, those headers are not obligatory.
Op 03 Jan 2013 om 21:59 heeft Ken Murchison <[hidden email]> het volgende geschreven:
> If a write lock is successfully created on an unmapped URL, should an ETag (with associated Location header) be returned for the empty resource in the 201 response?
> Kenneth Murchison
> Principal Systems Software Engineer
> Carnegie Mellon University