Did you intend to make this comment an issue?
If so, please send it to the [hidden email] comments list.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 12:32 AM
> To: Bob Freund
> Cc: Fabian Ritzmann; Rama Pulavarthi
> Subject: Freund 6/4/2007: Editorial Comment on WS-Addr Metadata
> Section 3.1.1: The current text is somewhat confusing. Unless
> WS-Addressing seeks to define its own semantics on wsp:Optional, it is
> best to defer to WS-Policy Framework with a reference.
> Change from:
> In order to indicate that the subject supports WS-Addressing
> does not require its use, an additional policy alternative
> should be provided which does not contain this assertion. This
> may be done in WS-Policy compact form by adding the attribute
> |wsp:Optional="true"| to the |wsam:Addressing| assertion.
> Change to:
> The optional assertion mechanism wsp:Optional, the compact
> authoring style defined by WS-Policy Framework, is used to
> specify that the subject supports WS-Addressing but does not
> require its use for the |wsam:Addressing| assertion (See
> WS-Policy Framework v1.5 [link]).