FW: Response to your counter-proposal in response to our prior action on WS-Addressing lc141

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

FW: Response to your counter-proposal in response to our prior action on WS-Addressing lc141

Bob Freund

Forwarded for the record

-----Original Message-----
From: Cindy McNally [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:35 AM
To: Bob Freund
Subject: RE: Response to your counter-proposal in response to our prior
action on WS-Addressing lc141

Yes.  That was an oversight on my part.  Thanks.


>From: "Bob Freund" <[hidden email]>
>To: "Cindy McNally" <[hidden email]>
>Subject: RE: Response to your counter-proposal in response to our prior

>action on  WS-Addressing lc141
>Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:18:23 -0400
>
>Cindy,
>Our editor has changed your proposed default WSDL 2.0 Action pattern
for

>faults slightly, by dropping the delimiter between the operation name
>and the direction token - this matches the pattern for non-faults.
>
>Your proposal:
>
>[tns] [delimiter] [interface name] [delimiter] [operation name]
>[delimiter] [direction] [delimiter] [fault name]
>
>Editor's version version:
>
>[tns] [delimiter] [interface name] [delimiter] [operation name]
>[direction] [delimiter] [fault name]
>
>I trust that this is ok.
>Thanks
>-bob
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [hidden email]
[mailto:public-ws-

> > [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Cindy McNally
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 12:22 AM
> > To: Bob Freund
> > Cc: [hidden email]
> > Subject: RE: Response to your counter-proposal in response to our
>prior
> > action on WS-Addressing lc141
> >
> >
> > Bob,
> >
> > Yes, as long as the WSDL working group does not substantially change
>my
> > proposal, I am satisfied.  Thank you.  My compliments to you and the
>WG
> > for
> > your efforts.
> >
> >
> > >From: "Bob Freund" <[hidden email]>
> > >To: "Cindy McNally" <[hidden email]>
> > >CC: <[hidden email]>
> > >Subject: Response to your counter-proposal in response to our prior
> > action
> > >on WS-Addressing lc141
> > >Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:42:12 -0400
> > >
> > >Cindy,
> > >
> > >We are delighted to report that the WG has reconsidered its
decision

> > to
> > >close your issue with no action and, due to your explanation and
> > >proposal offered in[1], have agreed to adopt your text as proposed.
> > Our
> > >decision is recorded in our issues list and minutes[2]
> > >We do intend to also check this conclusion with the WSDL working
>group
> > >to gain their concurrence.
> > >We hope that you find this resolution satisfactory.  Please respond
> > >accordingly to this message.
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >-bob
> > >
> > >Bob Freund
> > >Chair, W3C WS-Addressing WG
> > >
> > >[1]
> > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing-
> > comments/2007Ju
> > >n/att-0006/response.html
> > >[2]
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/7/06/18-ws-addressing-minutes.html
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Hotmail to go? Get your Hotmail, news, sports and much more!
> > http://mobile.msn.com
>

_________________________________________________________________
Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps.
http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?ss=Restaurants~Hotels~Amusement%20Park
&cp=33.832922~-117.915659&style=r&lvl=13&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&scene=
1118863&encType=1&FORM=MGAC01