[Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer

r12a

Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/

Comment 36
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
Editorial/substantive: E
Owner: RI

Location in reviewed document:
6.6.3

Comment:
It is very poorly explained what the difference is between this and the situation described in the last para of 6.6.2.


How about:


"Where legacy formats do no contain ruby markup conformant to [Ruby-TR], it is still possible to associate ruby text with a specified range of document content using the rubyRule element."


Note also s/and there one wants/and where one wants/




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer

Felix Sasaki

Hello i18n core,

This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3506 for our discussion.

Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement it. Please
have a look at
http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#ruby-implementation
, especially example 36.



Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't hear
 from you , we will assume this issue as closed.

Regards,

Felix


[hidden email] wrote:

> Comment from the i18n review of:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/
>
> Comment 36
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
> Editorial/substantive: E
> Owner: RI
>
> Location in reviewed document:
> 6.6.3
>
> Comment:
> It is very poorly explained what the difference is between this and the situation described in the last para of 6.6.2.
>
>
> How about:
>
>
> "Where legacy formats do no contain ruby markup conformant to [Ruby-TR], it is still possible to associate ruby text with a specified range of document content using the rubyRule element."
>
>
> Note also s/and there one wants/and where one wants/
>
>
>
>



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer

r12a

Personal response:

You copied my text so verbatim that you kept the typo ;-)

do no contain  ->  do not contain

RI


============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: 11 September 2006 04:30
> To: [hidden email]
> Cc: [hidden email]; [hidden email];
> [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of
> legacy ruby clearer
>
> Hello i18n core,
>
> This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3506 for our discussion.
>
> Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement
> it. Please have a look at
> http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#r
> uby-implementation
> , especially example 36.
>
>
>
> Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we
> don't hear  from you , we will assume this issue as closed.
>
> Regards,
>
> Felix
>
>
> [hidden email] wrote:
> > Comment from the i18n review of:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/
> >
> > Comment 36
> > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
> > Editorial/substantive: E
> > Owner: RI
> >
> > Location in reviewed document:
> > 6.6.3
> >
> > Comment:
> > It is very poorly explained what the difference is between
> this and the situation described in the last para of 6.6.2.
> >
> >
> > How about:
> >
> >
> > "Where legacy formats do no contain ruby markup conformant
> to [Ruby-TR], it is still possible to associate ruby text
> with a specified range of document content using the rubyRule
> element."
> >
> >
> > Note also s/and there one wants/and where one wants/
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer

Yves Savourel-2

Hi Richard,

The typo has been fixed:
http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#ruby-implementation

Thanks
-yves

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Richard Ishida
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 1:03 PM
To: 'Felix Sasaki'
Cc: [hidden email]; [hidden email]; [hidden email]
Subject: RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer


Personal response:

You copied my text so verbatim that you kept the typo ;-)

do no contain  ->  do not contain

RI