[Comment on ITS WD] Example 19 xml:lang

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Comment on ITS WD] Example 19 xml:lang

r12a

Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/

Comment 46
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
Editorial/substantive: S/E
Owner: RI

Location in reviewed document:
5.6

Comment:
Should this be identified by global rules as language information? If not, we should explain why in the language information data category section.


FS: The current definition 6.7.1. says "The element langRule is used to express that a given piece of content(selected by the attribute langPointer) is used to express language information as defined by [RFC 3066bis]." I would add a note saying


"Applying this data category to xml:lang attributes does not make sense since xml:lang is already defined interms of RFC 3066 or its successor". If that would address your concern, please add it to your comment.


I18n: We propose a slight alteration to the above:


Applying the langRule data category to xml:lang attributes using global rules is not necessary, since ...




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 19 xml:lang

Felix Sasaki

Hello i18n core,

This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3469 for our discussion.

Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement it. Please
have a look at
http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#langinfo-implementation
 , especially the note after example 38.



Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't hear
 from you , we will assume this issue as closed.

Regards,

Felix


[hidden email] wrote:

> Comment from the i18n review of:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/
>
> Comment 46
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
> Editorial/substantive: S/E
> Owner: RI
>
> Location in reviewed document:
> 5.6
>
> Comment:
> Should this be identified by global rules as language information? If not, we should explain why in the language information data category section.
>
>
> FS: The current definition 6.7.1. says "The element langRule is used to express that a given piece of content(selected by the attribute langPointer) is used to express language information as defined by [RFC 3066bis]." I would add a note saying
>
>
> "Applying this data category to xml:lang attributes does not make sense since xml:lang is already defined interms of RFC 3066 or its successor". If that would address your concern, please add it to your comment.
>
>
> I18n: We propose a slight alteration to the above:
>
>
> Applying the langRule data category to xml:lang attributes using global rules is not necessary, since ...
>
>
>
>