Call for Review of XHTML Test Cases 172, 173, and 174

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Call for Review of XHTML Test Cases 172, 173, and 174

Manu Sporny
This is a call for review for Test Cases 172, 173, and 174. Everybody is
encouraged to review these test cases. Reviews are due by next Thursday,
1600 UTC.

The test cases can be found at the following URL:

http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/test-suite/

For "Test Suite", select: "XHTML+RDFa 1.0"
For "Unit Test Status", select: "Unreviewed"

Here is a template to follow when responding:

TC172: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion
TC173: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion
TC174: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion

-- manu

--
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Establishing an Open Digital Media Commerce Standard
http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/09/28/a-digital-content-commerce-standard/


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Call for Review of XHTML Test Cases 172, 173, and 174

Ivan Herman-2


Manu Sporny wrote:

> This is a call for review for Test Cases 172, 173, and 174. Everybody is
> encouraged to review these test cases. Reviews are due by next Thursday,
> 1600 UTC.
>
> The test cases can be found at the following URL:
>
> http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/test-suite/
>
> For "Test Suite", select: "XHTML+RDFa 1.0"
> For "Unit Test Status", select: "Unreviewed"
>
> Here is a template to follow when responding:
>
> TC172: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion
Approved

> TC173: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion

Approved

> TC174: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion

Approved

Ivan

>
> -- manu
>

--

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

smime.p7s (5K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Call for Review of XHTML Test Cases 172, 173, and 174

Gregg Kellogg
In reply to this post by Manu Sporny
These all pass in my (unreleased) development version.

By the way, I'm moving active development of the Ruby RDFa parser to Reddy, My clone at http://github.com/gkellogg/reddy contains the RdfaParser, a new conforming RDF/XML parser and an N3 parser, along with improved graph semantics. I'm still working on some improvements to the Graph model with support for multiple stores, but hope to have something released in the next couple of weeks.

Gregg

On Nov 29, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:

This is a call for review for Test Cases 172, 173, and 174. Everybody is
encouraged to review these test cases. Reviews are due by next Thursday,
1600 UTC.

The test cases can be found at the following URL:

http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/test-suite/

For "Test Suite", select: "XHTML+RDFa 1.0"
For "Unit Test Status", select: "Unreviewed"

Here is a template to follow when responding:

TC172: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion
TC173: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion
TC174: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion

-- manu

--
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Establishing an Open Digital Media Commerce Standard
http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/09/28/a-digital-content-commerce-standard/



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Call for Review of XHTML Test Cases 172, 173, and 174

Shane McCarron
In reply to this post by Manu Sporny


Manu Sporny wrote:

> This is a call for review for Test Cases 172, 173, and 174. Everybody is
> encouraged to review these test cases. Reviews are due by next Thursday,
> 1600 UTC.
>
> The test cases can be found at the following URL:
>
> http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/test-suite/
>
> For "Test Suite", select: "XHTML+RDFa 1.0"
> For "Unit Test Status", select: "Unreviewed"
>
> Here is a template to follow when responding:
>
> TC172: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion
> TC173: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion
> TC174: approved/rejected/approved with modifications/needs discussion
>  
TC172: approved
TC173: approved
TC174: approved - but this seems really really goofy to me

--
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: [hidden email]