At this point I'm comfortable discussing that specific issue as part of the bis drafting process, rather than requiring an I-D for it. If that makes anyone uncomfortable, or if you'd like to write that draft, please speak up.
That leaves the following two drafts for consideration:
As with previous drafts for this effort, please make statements of support and intent to implement, or lack thereof. If you have concerns, please state why, rather than just saying "no."
If we can make a decision about them promptly, I think that in Berlin (or even beforehand) we'll be a point where can discuss any issues with them and start work on RFC6265bis itself. Therefore, please respond promptly.
Of course, that assumes that there are no other proposals forthcoming. I'm not aware of any; if you'd like to make one, please do so soon.
This email is meant to confirm that on the mailing list. Please send any comments you have that should be addressed before adoption (realizing that adopted documents aren't meant to be already complete - this is just adoption.)