Bug detect on a </div>

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Bug detect on a </div>

Nuno Barros
Hi,
I was validating an website, and I came across a html validation bug.(source attached)
The validation gave me this error:


If you search the source, you will check that the div's are correctly closed, can you please help me out here?

Thanks.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Fwd: Bug detect on a </div>

Nuno Barros
Sorry In attachement the source code

Thanks.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Nuno Barros <[hidden email]>
Date: 30 January 2015 at 15:04
Subject: Bug detect on a </div>
To: [hidden email]


Hi,
I was validating an website, and I came across a html validation bug.(source attached)
The validation gave me this error:


If you search the source, you will check that the div's are correctly closed, can you please help me out here?

Thanks.


src.html (84K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Fwd: Bug detect on a </div> ***SPAM***

Debbie Mitchell

 the message below is spam


---------- Original Message -----------
From: Nuno Barros <[hidden email]>
To: [hidden email]
Sent: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:07:47 +0000
Subject: Fwd: Bug detect on a </div>

> Sorry In attachement the source code
>
> Thanks.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Nuno Barros <[hidden email]>
> Date: 30 January 2015 at 15:04
> Subject: Bug detect on a </div>
> To: [hidden email]
>
> Hi,
>
> I was validating an website, and I came across a html validation bug.(source attached)
> The validation gave me this error:
>
> ​
>

>
> If you search the source, you will check that the div's are correctly closed, can you please help me out here?
>
> Thanks.
------- End of Original Message -------
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Fwd: Bug detect on a </div> ***SPAM***

Jukka K. Korpela
2015-01-30, 23:06, Debbie Mitchell wrote:

>   the message below is spam

Well, I can’t decide that, but the HTML document included does not have
the problem reported. Instead, it has two doctype strings, <!DOCTYPE
html> twice, and is otherwise valid, at least according to the W3C
validator.

Yucca