[Bug 26760] New: parse-ietf-date() grammar error

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 26760] New: parse-ietf-date() grammar error

Bugzilla from bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26760

            Bug ID: 26760
           Summary: parse-ietf-date() grammar error
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: Working drafts
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Functions and Operators 3.1
          Assignee: [hidden email]
          Reporter: [hidden email]
        QA Contact: [hidden email]

The description of parse-ietf-date() has a minor grammar error and a typo.

The typo - parse-ietf-dateTime should read parse-ietf-date

The grammar error

  input ::= S? dayname? ","? S ((datespec S time) | asctime) S?
should (I think) be
  input ::= S? (dayname ","? S)? ((datespec S time) | asctime) S?

(probably my mistake originally, sorry)

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 26760] parse-ietf-date() grammar error

Bugzilla from bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26760

Michael Kay <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <[hidden email]> ---
The changes have been applied.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Bug 26760] parse-ietf-date() grammar error

Bugzilla from bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
In reply to this post by Bugzilla from bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26760

Michael Kay <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <[hidden email]> ---
The WG agreed this should be fixed.

As well as the changes indicated, I have taken the liberty of improving the
suggestion in the non-normative note concerning how to generate an IETF date
using format-dateTime. Rather than using [Z0] to format the timezone and then
stripping the colon afterwards, the timezone can be generated in the correct
format using [Z0000].

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.