Allowed values in prefixes

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Allowed values in prefixes

Michael Hausenblas
All,

We just had a discussion on IRC [1] re allowed values in prefixes. Seems
that we have referenced the 'old', 1999 XMLNS spec in our syntax, that is
[2] points to [3]:

NCName  ::= (Letter <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#NT-Letter>  | '_')
(NCNameChar)*

And further 'Letter' points to the latest version (from 2008) [4] (as it
doesn't use a dated URI but the latest version of the XML spec).

I honestly dunno what to advise people here and/or if we'd need to change
anything - happy to hear what others think.

Cheers,
      Michael

[1] http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2010-01-27.html#T11-21-25
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#s_curies
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114/#NT-NCName
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-Letter

--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Allowed values in prefixes

Shane McCarron
The reference to the old xmlns spec was an error.  We should errata that
we are referencing the current xmlns spec.

Michael Hausenblas wrote:

> All,
>
> We just had a discussion on IRC [1] re allowed values in prefixes. Seems
> that we have referenced the 'old', 1999 XMLNS spec in our syntax, that is
> [2] points to [3]:
>
> NCName  ::= (Letter <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#NT-Letter>  | '_')
> (NCNameChar)*
>
> And further 'Letter' points to the latest version (from 2008) [4] (as it
> doesn't use a dated URI but the latest version of the XML spec).
>
> I honestly dunno what to advise people here and/or if we'd need to change
> anything - happy to hear what others think.
>
> Cheers,
>       Michael
>
> [1] http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2010-01-27.html#T11-21-25
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#s_curies
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114/#NT-NCName
> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-Letter
>
>  

--
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: [hidden email]



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Allowed values in prefixes

Michael Hausenblas

Thanks, Shane.

Cheers,
      Michael

--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Shane McCarron <[hidden email]>
> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:50:10 -0600
> To: Michael Hausenblas <[hidden email]>
> Cc: RDFa TF list <[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: Allowed values in prefixes
>
> The reference to the old xmlns spec was an error.  We should errata that
> we are referencing the current xmlns spec.
>
> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> We just had a discussion on IRC [1] re allowed values in prefixes. Seems
>> that we have referenced the 'old', 1999 XMLNS spec in our syntax, that is
>> [2] points to [3]:
>>
>> NCName  ::= (Letter <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#NT-Letter>  | '_')
>> (NCNameChar)*
>>
>> And further 'Letter' points to the latest version (from 2008) [4] (as it
>> doesn't use a dated URI but the latest version of the XML spec).
>>
>> I honestly dunno what to advise people here and/or if we'd need to change
>> anything - happy to hear what others think.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>       Michael
>>
>> [1] http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2010-01-27.html#T11-21-25
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#s_curies
>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114/#NT-NCName
>> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-Letter
>>
>>  
>
> --
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: [hidden email]
>
>