Acknowledging WSDL 2.0 issues.

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Acknowledging WSDL 2.0 issues.

Jonathan Marsh-2

As we prepare for our transition to PR, it would be very helpful to get an acknowledgement on a few of the issues that you raised with the group, stating whether you agree or disagree with our disposition (no action in each case) of the comment.  The result of having a recorded response from you will allow us to focus on those resolutions which are known to reflect a split between the Working Group and the community, instead of those where the existence of a split is unknown.

 

The relevant issues are:

 

·         CR056 [1], and our response [2]

·         CR131 [3], and our response [4]

·         CR140 [5], and our response [6]

 

Thanks!

 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR056

[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2006Oct/0009.html

[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR131

[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2007Jan/0010.html  

[5] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR140

[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2007Jan/0011.html

 

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com